Sally Brown’s new philosophy

Back from the long Labor Day weekend, with more of Goldstein’s Plato in CoPhi. Then in Environmental Ethics we’ll consider Naomi Klein’s contention that our aversion to long-term planning and our inability to so “no” have cut us off from past and future. Our entire present is a state of deep disconnect.

Plato’s Ring of Gyges might be a tempting tool to use, to try and restore our lost connections. Would that end justify duplicitous means? What would Sally Brown say?*

Some scientists can’t see the philosophical forest for the trees and thus become trapped in generational prejudice. They become philosophy jeerers, programmatically Ionian but without the enchantment. As for Goldstein, Russell’s History was the source of her first philosophical enchantment.

Just say “no,” says Klein, “to pipelines linked to expanded extraction,” to coal, and to “demands to open up new carbon frontiers (like the oil trapped under melting Arctic ice).” Saying no the the Alberta tar sands was a nice, if belated, start.

*No!! I like it! “No!” That’s a good philosophy.
“No!” “No!” “No!”
That’s you new philosophy, huh?
Yes. I mean– “No!”

5:45/6:25, 69/95, 7:06

via Blogger


Tags: ,

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: